What Exactly Is In The Public Domain Datewise?

Hi Logan

With the number of books etc entering the public domain constantly have you ever given thought to updating what exactly is in the public domain datewise? What I mean by that is 28 years + 47 years = 75 years. This makes everything lower than September 1933 public domain. Do you think it would be worth making that known – or at least a reasonable facsimile, ex everything < 1933 to be safe – or do you feel it’s better letting others find that out for themselves?

~ John

Hi John,

If only this were true!

In 1998 the U.S. Congress passed the Copyright Term Extension Act adding an additional 20 years to the duration enjoyed by copyrighted works.

To learn more about this…

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sonny_Bono_Copyright_Term_Extension_Act

For instance, a work published in the U.S. in 1923 for example…under the old copyright laws it would have been protected until 1952 (28 years after publication).

If the work was renewed in 1951, it would have another 47 years of protection (1998).

The Copyright Term Extension Act passed in 1998 (Public Law 105-298, 112 Stat. 2827, amending chapter 3 of title 17 of the United States Code) added another 20 years to the copyright duration for then copyrighted works.

Copyright protection ALWAYS lasts until the end of the calendar year.

Based on this, nothing new (other than works created by the Federal Government or purposely dedicated to the Public Domain) will enter the Public Domain in the U.S. until January 1st, 2019.

1923 + 28 + 47 + 20 = protected until midnight December 31st, 2018

The Copyright Term Extension Act effectively put a “freeze” on the growth of the Public Domain especially since millions of works were poised to enter the Public Domain at midnight on January 1st, 1999 with millions more following suit every year after as their copyright protection ran out.

Fortunately, the additional protection offered by this act was not retroactive, in other words it did not apply to works already in the Public Domain – it simply extended the copyright protection of works already protected anyway.

This is why I say with certainty that everything published in the U.S. BEFORE 1923 is safely in the public domain as evidenced by this statement found in the United States Copyright Office Circular 15T, “Extension of Copyright Terms”

Actually, there are a few very rare exceptions to the above statement but we can talk about these exceptions some other time if you are interested.

Everything published in the U.S. between 1923 – 1963 is in the Public Domain only if it’s copyright protection was NOT renewed in the 28th year after publication.

Sorry John, we can blame Disney for this (with the backing of a few other corporate giants) and their efforts to keep Mickey Mouse out of the Public Domain.

It’s just another example of how big business will stop at nothing to protect it’s assets even to the point of blatantly violating the spirit of the U.S. Constitution.

And really, who can blame them? Mickey Mouse is a cash cow.

There’s speculation that an attempt will be made to extend copyright duration again in 2017 to keep the freeze in place but that’s all rumors in dark alleys at this point.

Have a wonderful evening!

About The Author:

Logan Andrew is an online entrepreneur, information publisher, and author that has been using Public Domain material to create profitable products and businesses since 2001. He is also co-author of "The Public Domain Treasure Hunter's Survival Kit" available here. For more info Logan, click here.

[print_link]



Recommended Reading:

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

{ 7 comments… read them below or add one }

Erin March 13, 2010 at 2:22 pm

Yes, Logan, because I’m sure you’re sitting around looking for something to do … please tell us about the few few rare exceptions.

I recall thinking the same as John when I first started looking at the public domain and I cheerfully went around adding up the years and wondering why nobody had thought to change the 1923 date.

~ Erin

Logan March 13, 2010 at 2:57 pm

Ok Erin, you coaxed me into it you smooth talker you ~ lol

Leon Scott March 27, 2010 at 6:00 pm

How can I be sure NOT to infringe any copywright law ?

Logan March 28, 2010 at 5:33 am

Hi Leon,

Thanks for the great question.

And of course, it’s a question that you need to find an answer to before attempting to republish any work even if you feel strongly that the work is in the public domain.

Honestly, there’s only one answer to this question – you must develop a complete and thorough understanding of copyright law both as it pertains to the country a work was originally published in and where in the world you
plan on selling it.

You’re based in the U.K. so an understanding of U.K. copyright law and duration is a must.

Also, a good understanding of U.S. copyright law and durations based on publication year will be very helpful in your endeavors as well since you’ll find an absolute goldmine of public domain books that were originally published in the U.S.

You also need to understand what protection (in some cases none, in some cases much) current U.K. copyright law offers to books that are in the public domain in the U.S.

In short, there’s no quick, simple answer to your question.

It takes time and knowledge to research the status of a work’s copyright protection.

Thanks Leon!
Logan Andrew

Debbie March 22, 2011 at 3:13 pm

Hello Logan.

I just found a website for antique crafts and sewing patterns. They state all the patterns that they have scanned come from books that are in the public domain, they stated however because they have scanned the original work and photo edited the images in the material, that the work is now copyrighted by the people who scanned the work, and that this work falls under this license, licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike License.
http://www.antiquepatternlibrary.org/

Can Public Domain work be licensed under the above Creative Commons license?

Your thoughts on this matter is greatly appreciated.

Regards,
Debbie

Debra March 22, 2011 at 10:07 pm

Debbie…
This is a slippery slope they are trying to guide you down.

On the one hand – it seems reasonable to take something in Public Domain and “gussy it up” and call it your own “sort of”. Creative Commons isn’t “really” copyright… but they don’t want you to use it for commercial purposes in this case.

It’s sort of like Google or Archive.org giving a disclaimer that you can’t use the stuff they scanned for commercial purposes – because they scanned it and “made it look pretty”.

Baloney!!!

Public Domain is Public Domain – unless they made something NEW with it…. it’s still free to use by anyone.
Of course – I’m not a lawyer.. and would never tell you that I’m always right. LOL
I would always advise anyone to have the “original” in their hot little hands so you can compare what is original and what’s been changed.

Debbie March 23, 2011 at 12:04 am

Thanks Debra,

I think I will take your advise! lol because who knows how much was changed.

Regards,
Debbie

Leave a Comment

CommentLuv badge

Previous post:

Next post: